“I
will not speak with disrespect of the Republican Party. I always speak with
respect of the past.”
Woodrow Wilson
America is currently facing the highest pre-election jobless rate since World War II with an estimated 23 million Americans unemployed or underemployed. The number of Americans on food stamps has increased from 32 million to 46 million since Obama took office (source: USFDA). His signature healthcare legislation, as recently as June this year, had a mere 34 percent of the public in favour, while 48 percent disapproved of it (source: CBS News). The national debt increase is now officially larger under Obama’s watch than it was under all of Bush’s eight years in office; “The Debt rose $4.899 trillion during the two terms of the Bush presidency. It has now gone up $4.939 trillion since President Obama took office” (source: CBS News). The U.S. recession officially ended in June 2009, and the pace of recovery has been anemic at best and showing no signs of changing its current trajectory anytime soon.
Woodrow Wilson
America is currently facing the highest pre-election jobless rate since World War II with an estimated 23 million Americans unemployed or underemployed. The number of Americans on food stamps has increased from 32 million to 46 million since Obama took office (source: USFDA). His signature healthcare legislation, as recently as June this year, had a mere 34 percent of the public in favour, while 48 percent disapproved of it (source: CBS News). The national debt increase is now officially larger under Obama’s watch than it was under all of Bush’s eight years in office; “The Debt rose $4.899 trillion during the two terms of the Bush presidency. It has now gone up $4.939 trillion since President Obama took office” (source: CBS News). The U.S. recession officially ended in June 2009, and the pace of recovery has been anemic at best and showing no signs of changing its current trajectory anytime soon.
History has also shown that no
incumbent president has won re-election with a weak economy. George H.W. Bush
got the boot in 1992 because of a weak economy (even though he had just won the
Gulf war), Jimmy Carter in 1980, Gerald Ford in 1976, Herbert Hoover in 1932,
William Howard Taft in 1912. Both Benjamin Harrison and Grover Cleveland were also
unceremoniously dispatched by the American people because the economy was
hurting. “In fact, this formulation holds
for every case of a deposed incumbent going back to the 1850s, which is as far
back as NBER’s data goes.” (source: The Daily Caller). There have been numerous
analyses done by pundits, and even academics are scratching their heads and
offering explanations that say the personalities of the candidates maybe
playing a more important role today versus the pain people are feeling at the
pump. Or that it boils down to Mr. Romney’s inability to connect with the
people, the way Mr. Obama does. A few days ago a group of twenty leading
conservatives “accused
ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN of rigging coverage to help reelect President
Obama.” (source: Washington Examiner). However,
history and conventional wisdom would suggest that all other factors matter
little when the economic picture is bleak, painful and unemployment very high. So,
the only question that remains to be asked is why is Mitt Romney not running
away with this election, and why is this race even a contest?
Rather than look to history, biased
polling and conspiracy theories, the Republican Party would be better served to
take a long hard look within their own tent. With some honest soul searching they
will find that all the answers lead back to George W. Bush, and the party he
left behind after eight years of internal turmoil. When Bush won re-election in
2004 it was clear that the cracks that emerged during his first term had
started to widen within the party. It resulted in the GOP losing both the House
and Senate in 2006, which served to further widen these internal cracks, ensuring
that the ideological earthquake that had been swelling within the ranks was now
a forgone conclusion. There has long been a small but vocal minority within the
Republican ranks that believed this country has been on an unimpeded road to liberal
hell and damnation; dominated by feckless Democrats and lily-livered RINO’s
(Republicans in name only) who have enacted welfare policies and created a
culture of handouts versus hard work, slowly destroying the once strong moral
and God-fearing social fabric of America. The attacks on 9/11 presented the
perfect opportunity, and George W. the perfect patsy, to implement their ultra-conservative
agenda. It would start with a strike first (ask questions later) foreign policy
and be followed by a audacious reversal and re-drawing of society and domestic
policy to lead us towards a more conservative promised land. However, it did
not quite pan out that way as they clearly bit off more than they could chew in
an attempt to reverse sixty plus years in one Presidential term.
The ill-conceived and poorly
executed Iraq war only served to sidetrack from the half started war in
Afghanistan and more importantly the hunt for Bin Laden. It also forced America
to live beyond its means, at a time when her economic might and global
leadership status were already in decline. China, India, Brazil, Russia and
South Africa were all emerging as strong economic powers, feeling more
confident about their place on the world stage and thus less fearful of
American dominance, than ever before in history. Meanwhile, an administration embroiled in
trying to save face in Iraq totally missed the numerous red flags and warning signs
within the over-heating housing marketing. While Bush is not responsible for
the greatest financial crisis since the Great Depression, he is accountable for
ignoring and not paying enough attention to the cracks that had started to show
up in the housing market and broader economy, well before his treasury
secretary informed him of the stark choice between a $700B bailout and total financial
meltdown. At the same time, reeling from botched and hugely unpopular Iraq war,
Bush had started to distance himself from Cheney and the Neocon’s; softening
his rhetoric, seeking diplomacy in both North Korea and Iran, and giving the
foreign policy reigns to his softer Secretary of State. By the end of his
tenure, the Bush presidency not only looked and felt like an unmitigated
disaster for the country but he had also shattered the hard right dream of taking
back the country by reversing liberalism. Under Bush there had been an unprecedented
growth in the size of government, never before seen deficits (all financed by
borrowing from China), he championed immigration reform that would allow
current illegals to stay, provided government handouts, corporate bailouts and extended
unemployment assistance, and there was no more tough talk or threats of
war with Iran or any other axis of evil power. This betrayal of almost all the
most dearly held conservative principles by Bush led to further disenchantment within
the Republican ranks and gave birth to the Tea Party. The Tea Party calls
itself a grassroots movement for all the people but acts more like it is
anti-government, anti-spending/bailouts/stimulus, anti-immigration and
anti-compromise politics.
The Tea Party would not be a bad
thing if it had a reasonable view about reducing the size of government,
bringing down deficit spending, simplifying the tax code, reducing personal and
corporate tax rates and overhauling and cleaning up Obamacare but the fact that
it has refused to compromise or even sit down and discuss any of these issues makes
it feels like their only agenda is to hijack the GOP and yank the entire party to
the extreme right. Unfortunately, politics is about compromise by its very
nature. Ideology is not. By holding a gun to the head of the GOP the Tea
partiers have only served to hurt their chances of success. They have made the
GOP look like the party of NO, and provided Obama a free pass, even though he
has done little to reach out and seek compromise himself. If you ask the
average voter they will say that the Republicans have refused to compromise or
reach across the aisle. This growing movement within the party has also forced
every GOP presidential candidate to lean further right and appeal only to the
extreme right wing base of the party. We saw how John McCain’s VP pick to
placate his base turned out, and now a once moderate, slightly right of center,
and once imminently electable Massachusetts Governor has been forced to expend considerable
time and energy trying to prove that he is conservative enough to his own base.
Frankly, this is pretty much all that Romney has been consumed with so far and it
is also entirely responsible for his choice of running mate and all his recent
gaffes. The man is trying so hard to be someone and something he is not; in the
bargain he has not spent any time wooing the electorate, or formulating a strategy
to fight his opponent. Meanwhile Obama has spent all his time and money making
Romney look like a man who is constantly flip flopping, on virtually every
principle and dearly held belief, and has successfully painted him as a weak
and ineffective leader who will bend to the will of his party, every time.
Finally, it amazes me how
Republicans today behave like the eight years of Bush never happened. That by choosing
to ignore all the harsh realities and problems faced by America under his
leadership they will somehow magically bear no responsibility. Or that the
electorate will simply forget. In this context, laying blame for ALL of
America’s problems at Obama’s feet is not only disingenuous but an incredibly
naïve and dangerous strategy. Americans are well aware that the grave problems facing
this country have been in the making for a few generations. Social security,
Medicaid, Medicare, federal spending and ballooning deficits are all cans that have
been kicked down the road by both Democratic and Republican presidents alike. What’s
more, the electorate today is completely disillusioned with both the House and
Senate; much more than they are with the person in the White House. So blaming
a president for all our ills, when it is Congress that has the power to act and
solve many of them, is like cutting their nose, particularly for Republicans. Consider
that during six of Bush’s eight years the GOP controlled both the House and the
Senate, and for the last six years of Clinton’s, before that. They also won
back the House after Obama’s first two years in office, so have controlled it
for half of his presidency. So, as long as the party is unable to fess up to
the skeletons in their own closet and admit to the many failures during the junior
Bush years, every Republican candidate who is electable will be burdened by the
ghost of George W. Bush. He will continue to haunt them until the party is
willing to exorcise his ghost. Or, with each subsequent electoral loss, the
party can continue to react by pushing itself further to the right supporting candidates
who have no chance of being elected. They will only end up looking more
extreme, older, largely white male and further and further out of touch with women’s rights
and modern America.
The majority of Americans are
thirsting for new ideas and real-solutions not no compromise ideology and zero accountability. It would serve the Grand Old Party well to remember that the voter is not a moron, (she is your wife)…