Image: Sprint Retail Store Poster
“Customers have to wait one or two hours
to get a phone and that's not acceptable.”
Marcelo
Claure, CEO, Sprint Wireless
At the outset I want to
be clear that dealing with wireless companies has always been akin to getting a
wisdom tooth removed without anesthesia. However, given that this is 2017, the
age of big data, real-time analytics, beacons and of every grandmother knowing that
CRM stands for customer relationship management, I had some expectation that my
experience with Sprint would not be like it was
still 1990.
Our fateful journey
started at the only Sprint store near us. The first sign of trouble came when
the store manager informed me plan options the store offered were limited,
compared to what customer service could offer. It is odd that Sprint is unable
to offer the same options at retail, via phone or online, in 2017, but I said I
would call when I got home. But that would have been too easy; we were informed
that it was better to do the upgrade after we changed our plan, or we would not
get access to the good plans.
I thought to myself that Sprint should make life easier for customers, not harder, especially for loyal ones who are about to renew their vows with the company.
I thought to myself that Sprint should make life easier for customers, not harder, especially for loyal ones who are about to renew their vows with the company.
I acquiesced and spent
the next hour deciphering plan options with customer service by phone while standing at the store counter. During this time we
also found out that we would need to postdate the new plan or face pro-rating
fees that would double our cost for the month. No doubt this was designed to be
just another way for customers to pay Sprint for their loyalty.
Two and a half hours
later we walked out with one phone, one on order and a new plan that would take
effect in a month.
My phone arrived a few
days later and it was the wrong colour. By now I was also starting to get used
to the obstacles Sprint seemed to like to put up – to test customer loyalty.
Upon informing the store
of their mistake, I was told I needed to wait for a return package that would
arrive in 5-7 business days, by mail. Then I needed to wait another 5-7
business days for Sprint to process the return, and only then could the store
order the right colour for me.
Out of data and with no
new phone, I asked why I was being punished for their mistake. I was told it was because
this was not a Sprint corporate store.
I realised that I has
just failed another test of customer loyalty.
I walked into this
store, the only one in our area code, after seeing a big fat Sprint logo on the
storefront, Sprint branded posters on walls, shelves full of Sprint
merchandising, promotional cardboard cutouts with Sprint exclusive offers,
Sprint logos on the salespeople’s t-shirt,
but I failed to notice the small certificate on the
wall that said “Sprint preferred retailer.” My bad.
I decided to make a last
ditch appeal to the all-powerful customer service and asked them to ship me a
new phone, while I waited for the circuitous return process to unfold. They
were very apologetic and set-up an appointment for me to visit a corporate
store, on the other side of town, and said I could simply exchange the phone.
Problem solved!
It was a bright and
beautiful Sunday afternoon when I ventured out to exchange my phone.
Upon checking in at the store I was promptly informed that the exchange could
not be done at the store. And they added that they did not care what customer
service had told me, because customer
service had no authority over stores. Thankfully,
they took pains to re-assure me that this happened all the time to customers,
making me feel all warm and fuzzy for not being
singled-out.
After a heated back and
forth, I dug in and said I was not leaving until my issue was resolved. They dialed customer
service and handed me the phone to figure it out with customer service. With
a strong sense of déjà vu I spent the next two hours,
on the phone, standing at yet another Sprint store.
The customer service
people were apologetic and admitted that I had been given erroneous
information, vindicating the store, but not really servicing this customer. They
assured me that the rep would be “coached”, which was wonderful, but
again did nothing to resolve my issue. After a long
and patient wait, someone in the ‘order support department’ where I ended up
figured out that they could simply cancel the original order and have the
corporate store create a new one and give me the correct phone.
Wait, the best is yet to
come. We now get to part two of the torment, regarding the plan change.
While upgrading the
phone, feeling badly about the ordeal everyone in the store had witnessed, the
salesperson offered to look at my plan and see if he could save me money, only to discover that I was
tethered to a wireless hotspot device that was on contract - totally
unbeknownst to me.
I remember it being
given as a free gift during our last upgrade; one I was told
required a data plan but no mention of a two-year contract. So I said get rid
of it, which required me to pay an early termination fee of over $100. Again,
the store folks empathised with my plight and genuinely
tried to help, but clearly lacked the authority to
free me from my bondage.
So I reached out once
more to the all-powerful customer service, and they transferred me to the termination department and
to someone who said they would solve my problem without a termination fee. I
was unwilling to pay because I was never overtly made aware of
a contract. Three quarters of the way through the process the line got cut. I
waited but nobody called back, even though they had my number.
So I called back and got
a different rep, possibly in the Philippines. She
was completely clueless. This person could not even
find the device I was referring to, leave alone understand the issue.
After what seemed like
an eternity of explaining, and getting nowhere, I asked to speak with a
supervisor, but she kept putting me on hold, while going off to ask someone
questions and then coming back and asking me the same question. With my
Gandhi-like patience starting to run thin, I firmly asked to speak with a supervisor, at which point she hung up.
Glutton for punishment,
I called back again.
Of course, I got a new
rep, to whom I had to repeat the entire ordeal (this happened every time I
called); who was again polite and very apologetic,
but said I needed another department. I asked
that he at least brief the person they were transferring me to, so I wouldn't
have to go through the entire story every time I was cut-off.
I must have repeated my
story at least a half a dozen times as I got transferred between departments,
and finally reached someone with an American accent. At least she could
understand the issue – progress!
She patiently took me through numerous options. One requires a degree in rocket science to understand the permutations and combinations of data plans and device leasing options, but despite this she was unable to do the one thing I needed – waive the early termination fee.
She patiently took me through numerous options. One requires a degree in rocket science to understand the permutations and combinations of data plans and device leasing options, but despite this she was unable to do the one thing I needed – waive the early termination fee.
I suggested she talk
with a supervisor and explain that I was ready to leave Sprint over a $110
termination fee, resulting
in a loss of approx. $200 per month revenue over the
next two years from me. The math was easy. She
agreed wholeheartedly, as did her supervisor but again both lacked the lacked
the authority to what they truly wanted: to retain this customer. They did offer me a one-time $30 credit to
lessen the pain.
Needing to right a great service
injustice and feeling like a combination of Mandela and the Energizer bunny, I reached out to Sprint’s CEO, Marcelo Claure on Twitter, asking to speak with him directly because it was
clear that he was the ONLY person in the company with the authority to waive
this fee.
Needless to say he did
not respond but had something called “Team Marcel” reach out. I got a call from
a lady in the corporate office and she too was also extremely apologetic and said
unequivocally that my experience was totally unacceptable and that she would
personally look into the entire matter. She magically waived the early
termination fee…
I am still completely at
a loss to understand why such a simple process for an upgrade and plan change
required numerous phone calls, three store visits, countless hours on the phone
with representatives from multiple departments and continents and tweeting the CEO. I have been told childbirth
is less painful.
I want to be clear that, based on my experience
across all of Sprint's touch-points, the
central issue has little to do with poor or rude employees; in fact the
majority I dealt with expressed frustration at not being able to resolve
my issue. It has everything to do with a complex organisational
structure that is badly siloed, coupled with employees whose hands are tied and
who lack the authority to provide resolution, use of third party resellers
without a consistent service policy, and offshoring to poorly trained customer
service reps who sometimes barely understand the English language, and finally
the lack of a proper escalation policy.
This is clearly a
management issue that begins at the top with a lack of singular focus on
customer care and retention, which you would think is the most important aspect
in an industry plagued with the highest customer churn.
So unless Mr. Claure
meant he was working on increasing wait times to four and five hours when he said “Customers
have to wait one or two hours to get a phone and that's not acceptable”, I
do hope he gets in touch with me. I still
believe he needs to hear this unbelievably frustrating and painful experience,
firsthand, because no customer should ever have to be
put through this again.